The New York Rangers, a franchise known for its success and ability to attract top talent, has recently faced some draft-related setbacks that have left fans questioning their decisions. One such decision that stands out is the selection of Lias Andersson in the 2017 NHL Draft. This move has become a topic of discussion and regret, especially when compared to the potential they could have gained by drafting Nick Suzuki.
The Andersson Experiment: A Flop?
In 2017, the Rangers held the seventh overall pick, a prime opportunity to draft a game-changer. However, with top prospects like Nico Hischier and Cale Makar already taken, they opted for Andersson, a Swedish center. The plan was to develop him into a reliable cornerstone, but it didn't pan out as expected.
Andersson's performance at the pro level was underwhelming. In his rookie season, he managed just one goal and one assist in seven games. His second season saw minimal improvement, with two goals and four assists in 41 games. By his third season, Andersson's frustration was evident, as he requested a trade and was eventually loaned to HV71 in Sweden before being dealt to the Los Angeles Kings.
The Suzuki Alternative: A Missed Opportunity?
Six picks after selecting Andersson, the Vegas Golden Knights drafted Nick Suzuki, who would go on to become a star with the Montreal Canadiens. Suzuki's development into one of the top playmaking centers in the league is a testament to his talent and the Canadiens' foresight. His seventh season was exceptional, with career-highs in assists (72), points (101), and a plus/minus rating of +37. What's even more impressive is his defensive prowess, earning him the Selke Trophy for best defensive forward.
The irony is not lost on former Rangers GM Jeff Gorton, who now works for the Canadiens and sees the success Suzuki has brought to the team. It's a stark reminder of the decision he made back in 2017, passing on a player who has become a cornerstone for another franchise.
The Center of Attention: A Rangers Dilemma
The Rangers' center position has been a source of concern for some time. With Andersson's departure and the trade for Vincent Trocheck, they acquired prospect Cole Beaudoin, hoping he can fill the void. However, the question remains: could Suzuki have been the answer to their center crisis? It's a hypothetical situation that will forever linger in the minds of Rangers fans and management.
In my opinion, the Rangers' decision to pass on Suzuki is a classic example of the 'what if' scenario in sports. It's a reminder that draft picks are a high-stakes game, and sometimes, the safest bet doesn't always pay off. The Andersson pick, while a gamble, didn't pan out, and the potential of Suzuki was left unexplored. It's a fascinating look at the fine line between success and disappointment in the world of sports management.
